Tag Archives: iPod

#142 iPad to PS3

The other day I was thinking, as you do, and it came across me, why can’t you use an idevice such as an iPhone or iPad to control basic functions of a PS3? A bit of a random thought I know, but using one as a remote would give more functionality than a standard controller.

The way I see it would work (and I have googled to see if it has already been done and as far as I’m aware, it hasn’t), is that it would be in app form. It would be loaded up and connect via either bluetooth or wifi to the PlayStation. Almost acting as a secondary display, an XMB (cross media bar) would be displayed on the iPad screen, all the usual gestures would be usable and the functions could be used. It wouldn’t be able to be used to play games with, but it would make sense if it could be used to view images, play music or play video with good playback functionality.

Using the standard PS3 controller for media functions on a PS3 can get a bit confusing, and not many users would be willing to fork out for a specific media remote for it. The number of users who have iDevices is pretty much at 100 million at the moment, and the app would be available to all, and in my opinion, something which could be quite popular.

Here is something I quickly knocked up to show what I mean, even if it just looks as though it is a secondary screen…

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

#99 ProDESKTOP iPod Mini

Another bit of work I did during school, albeit when I was finished all the work we were supposed to do, so a side project if you will. I took my iPod Mini and a ruler and sat down to recreate it in ProDESKTOP, the 3d modelling package used at school. I am rather pleased with the way it turned out, especially since it was all done as one component, a method which certainly was frowned upon. I as sure I had rendered versions, making it look exactly like the Blue 1st generation model, but I must not have saved them as jpegs. Acht well.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

#60 It’s an Icon

One of the main gripes people have about the iPhone is the battery life which they can get from it, most of the time, they need to charge it at the end of every day. Yes it is a problem since it is a smartphone and has many additional features and of course, if it has features, people will then use them, draining the battery.

One product which has come up as a solution to this ‘problem’, since the iPhone does not have a user removable battery, is separate battery packs for the phone. These have usually been incorporated into a case of some sorts, so it is on visually obvious that you have a battery attached to your phone. Essential TPE on the other hand have created an icon… Quite literally!

Called ‘The Icon”, they have taken the charging icon which appears when you are charging your phone up (or iPod Touch for that matter) and made it into a physical product. It looks just like the real thing, but in 3D. The surface of the battery pack shows you how much juice is left inside of it by how much of it is still illuminated by the use of EL film. If you’re wondering how much life it adds to the phone, for 3G talktime it increases by 3 hours, and audio playback by 18 hours. The ‘Works with iPhone’ logo is present, so it has been officially tested by Apple, which is good reassurance.

It is however only to be found in stores in Asia at the moment with no apparent plans to take it anywhere else. So if you would like one, better book a plane ticket or ask someone nicely to bring you one back.

Link: essential tpe

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

#43 There’s An App For That, A Very Well Designed One Too

Again, this post is about something which I found online. I should really stop doing this as, well, it probably isn’t the best of things to be doing when I could be getting on with some sort of work.

How many of you out there have an iPod Touch or an iPhone? Well this post is probably most relevant to you then. A while ago, someone posted a link to this site on Twitter, can’t remember who it was so I am unable to give them credit for it, but nonetheless, it is a site dedicated to showcasing all of the, or what are considered to be the best produced and designed applications in the iTunes App Store.

app.itize.us has a mission statement which is as follows:

app.itize.us is a painstakingly curated presentation of the best produced and designed iPhone applications that are available for download via the App Store.

I agree with every word in that sentence, figuratively speaking of course.

A few weeks ago whilst on this site, browsing, I stumbled across what has to be my favourite game I have ever played on my iPhone or iPod Touch. Colorbind. Essentially, the aim of the game is to connect all the dots on the screen with the coloured strips of paper. It is an utterly gorgeous game which probably wouldn’t work very well on any other platform. It is a good way to let the time slip by. In a lecture, before going to bed, if you have nothing else constructive to do, or even if you should be doing something else.

There are 80 levels in total, ranging from simple one colour puzzles to more complicated 4 colour conundrums. Included is a tutorial, but the game seems very intuitive from the very start. I highly recommend this game, it is without a doubt the one of the best 59p’s I have ever spent. Slight update, I seem to have got the game when it was at its discounted price, it is currently £1.19, but it is still worth the little extra money.

The website for Colorbind is nonverbal.ch

Link directly to application in iTunes: Colorbind

If you own an iPod Touch or an iPhone, or if by the time you are reading this, an iPad, then I couldn’t urge you more to go to app.itize.us and find something which is considered to be wonderfully designed. On top of that I am going to say definitely buy Colorbind, well worth the money, even if you aren’t sure about buying it, there is also a lite version, but why waste time and install that when you could have the full one instead?

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

#38 Google it.

Before you start to read this, I’m going to give a word of warning that due to the mood in which I am in whilst writing this today (21st February 2010), I do ramble on quite a bit, so if you want to skip to the end, you can just take a look at the pictures and just be done with it.

Over the past couple of years there has been something which has become ever so annoying and what is worse, they don’t seem to know that they are doing this. If you haven’t already guessed who or what I am talking about, then I’m guessing you didn’t read the title of this post. Google are the culprit, Google are the problem, and knowing Google, they think they are the solution. From where I am standing they are slowly trying to take over the world, through the dreaded act of diversifying. I wrote a post about this and how I thought companies were going down the wrong path with this way back in August. In fact it was my second post on here, and guess what. My opinion still has not changed.

Google obviously started off as a search engine, and its popularity just began to grow. They bought YouTube. A good move in the long term but at the time it did mean that they wouldn’t really be continuing with Google Video which at the time, my friends and I would prefer it to their new acquisition. Every so often, a trip into the Google Labs would be in order just to see what sort of things they were working on. To view the trending searches of the day etc, just to see what was going on. It appealed to the geek side of me.

Another step in the right direction was Google Earth, pretty much a standalone extension of Google Maps. I was an early adopter of this, or at least I think I was, and it was great, and it still is, despite being a bit of a resource hog on my computer. There are times where I am unable to resist loading it up just to have a shot in the flight simulator in it.

This is the level of diversification which I would say I was comfortable with. They were a search engine company, who had a range of other products or services which also allowed users to search for what they wanted, whether it be places, or videos.

In recent years it does seem as though Google are trying to take over the world, very much in the same vein as what Microsoft doing. But whereas Microsoft buys out businesses and makes itself grow even larger. Google gives the impression that they will have a shot at it and if it works it works and if it doesn’t then well, at least they tried. Whilst I do admire them for doing this, I don’t think that it is the right thing to do. We all need competition and it just seems that Google are trying to eliminate them all.

They launched Google Wave. Supposedly it was supposed to reinvent the way in which we use email. After the initial surge of interest and usage, it has fallen by the side of the popularity trail. I will go on and check it every so often, as I was lucky enough to have been given an invite by a friend, but the conversations had with people have just dried up. It does work quite well, but as it is still in Beta, or even Alpha form, there are still quite a few bugs in it. My MacBook can barely run it, and my iMac will frequently beachball when I use it. The longer waves have load times worthy of being given their own birthday. I’ll use it if they improve it, but at the current moment in time, there hasn’t been any sort of improvement or modifications since mid December, which was when I joined it.

One of the most recent ventures by Google is Buzz. Where they are trying to take on the likes of Twitter, Facebook and all the other sort of main stream social networking sites by providing something which just doesn’t make sense. I seem to have signed up to it by accident. It appears in my sidebar when I log onto Googlemail. I’ve not really had a look at it, but from what I’ve heard it has been a MASSIVE fail. There has been complaints about it and regarding privacy issues, it has also led to an investigation into it (well from what I can remember anyways). It definitely didn’t appear in Twitter’s trending topics for very long compared to Wave, and I don’t actually know anyone who uses it.

One of the only non search/mapping/email things I will use google for (apart from video since that technically is YouTube), is iGoogle. But even then, not very often. It isn’t my homepage, that currently is the Apple UK homepage. I don’t use it to check the weather as I have perfectly good (well, mediocre) widgets for that. Emails? Nope, I use the Mail application. So what do I use it for? The only thing I use iGoogle for is Google Reader, so I can quickly see if there have been any updates on any RSS feeds I follow. This probably isn’t what Google want me to do, but I have other things which are much better at doing what I need to do.

Whilst I am on a roll, I suppose I will have to mention the Google phone and operating system. The Nexus One is their answer to the iPhone, and it has already developed its own following. The operating system, pretty much a desktop version of their mobile operating system, Android, is planned to be a ‘cloud’ based operating system, where the users information isn’t stored directly onto the computer in which they are using, but instead on a server many miles away. Whilst this has its advantages in some areas such as users of multiple computers, it does have quite a few drawbacks. From what I can fathom out, or can be bothered to fathom out, you need to be able to connect to the internet in order to access all of your files, or most of them anyway, which is fine if you are a tech-addict who doesn’t leave their home, or areas which have internet access, but for others this isn’t really the way forward. However, I have just remembered that I am sure I read somewhere that this operating system was aimed more specifically at netbooks rather than desktops or laptops. Netbooks because they aren’t generally used at the users primary computer, it is usually their secondary, or third computer.

I am not saying that I hate Google. I use them as my primary searching facility, and email… and maps. But the thing I don’t like is the fact that they are trying to do a Microsoft and take over the world, as it were. In doing so they are slowly destroying the links they have made in the past few years. Because of the Nexus One, they have already lost a key position on the board of Apple. Why not just stay a search company, but keeping the most popular additions they have (some, not all)? Become even better at what they do instead of coming up with other services which have an impact, but don’t have the momentum to keep going. I don’t know why, even after this post which is closing in on the 1300 word mark. I guess the mood that I am in has dictated the way in which I have been able to decipher the information and just vented it out as a rant. I’m not complaining. But I am starting to query how much this has to do with design. Ah well.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

#30 The Fabled Tablet in Apple Flavour

If the internet is to be believed, then in the next few days, Apple is set to announce a tablet computer. Essentially a large iPod Touch or iPhone, the tablet is rumoured to share many of features with the two mentioned devices. It will have a touch screen with much more advanced multi-touch and a 10.1″ screen.

For a long time it was speculated that they would enter the netbook market. A market which has grown hugely in the past few years. The tablet is also not too dissimilar in size to these netbooks.

Whilst I am still not 100% sure what I think of this rumoured product, I personally think someone has thrown a curve ball and we are in store for something much more interesting. On top of that, I would like to see a new iPhone, with new features and better specs, a greater step from the 3GS than the 3GS was from the 3G. This is because, unashamed, I would like to replace my iPhone 3G which I have had since launch date, and this is on top of me stating I would keep using it until it dies.

Going back to the ‘iSlate’, as it has been dubbed (rubbish name in my opinion), one of the tablet related issues I am most interested in, is its exterior design, the way it looks. The basis of this, I believe, will depend mostly on what operating system it uses. A modified iPhone OS, or a modified OS X system. If it is the iPhone OS route, it will primarily be portrait oriented interface and exterior design, and horizontally if it is the OS X route.

Since I did a reasonable job guessing with the Magic Mouse , I’ve had a shot at what I think the tablet would look like. Guessing it will be a mostly landscape device, I have made it look not too dissimilar to the iMac. It even has a Jay Leno/iMac G5/Intel chin on it. There may also be a possibility that it has a stand on the back so it can be angled on a desk, in a similar sort of fashion that the iBook G3 had a handle. The back of the device, I think will be the same sort of shape to the iPhone 3G(S), but if it isn’t, then it probably will share many design cues with the next generation iPhone, rumoured for the summer. There isn’t too much to play with on touch screen devices due to the current technology, in terms of shape since it needs to have a completely flat surface for the screen, hence why all, or most of these touch devices look very similar.

And on that note, I leave you with a video of Microsoft CEO, Steve Ballmer being asked to sign a MacBook Pro, quite funny, if maybe only for the geekier side of you.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

#25 I’m Falling for a “bell’italiano”

First post of 2010. Happy New Year and all that jazz I suppose.

Now that all the formalities are over I can get underway with the serious business, and it has happened again. The last time this happened it didn’t exactly end the way I hoped it would, but I sort of have a feeling that this time is going to end better. A beautiful Italian has entered my thoughts and I can’t quite seem to get rid of her.

Now, I know what you’re thinking. You don’t really want to hear much about my personal life, and you are correct, I am not talking about a woman (not this time anyway), but instead, a car. A very beautiful car. An Alfa Romeo. The 147. The first one. Before the facelift.

Why have I fallen for this car, and fallen for it again, because as I recall, I fell for it the first time I saw it when it was launched in 2000. The reason is simple. The search is now on properly on for a first car. I want something different, and because I have not driven a lot of cars in my time, my choices are purely (at this moment in time) based upon the looks of the car. The design. The company. The emotions it evokes. And the Alfa, manages to tick most of my boxes.

The 147, designed by Wolfgang Egger and Walter de’Silva, is easily one of the most gorgeous things ever to be created by man, alongside the Bang & Olufsen Beosound 9000 designed by David Lewis and the Barcelona Chair designed by Ludwig Mies Van Der Rohe. It has won awards f0r its design, and once it was given its midlife facelift, a journalist described the car as losing feminine features, namely due to the shape and size of the iconic triangular grill. That is all I am going to say about that bit.

Fine fair enough, I am gushing about it, and my thoughts and emotions (slightly) are getting in the way of saying anything constructive. The car isn’t perfect. It is an Alfa, and of course we know that they aren’t exactly the most reliable of cars, they can be expensive to run, and everyone will secretly hate you for having one because they know they really want one, but don’t want to suffer the heartbreak of standing next to the road in a cloud of steam when it fails on them. These small foibles however, give the car a personality, a soul, a character which is lacking in other cars today, and yes that is slightly cliched for Alfa Romeos, but who cares, because we all know it is true.

In fact, soul, character and personality is something which is missing from pretty much all products today as well, for the simple reason that companies don’t care about that. They just want to shift as many products out of the factory as they can possibly manage. Sure we can add those traits to products ourselves if we decide to personalise them, I swear to god that my iPod mini, my first iPod has a soul, but it isn’t the same as something which has been built with the same passion that food is made with, the same passion people when they are with someone they love, the same passion to keep going with something even though it might not be the right thing to be doing.

And on that note, before my heart starts to do the talking instead of my head, I leave you with a video clip from Top Gear, on the Alfa Romeo 147 GTA. It may not have been the most memorable of posts to have written as my first of the year, and some of you may have gotten bored halfway through, but each to our own.

Goodnight.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

#24 Review of 2009 & 2010 Predictions

2009. A year to remember or a year to forget? I’ve put together this review of my year at University, saying what I thought about the second semester of first year and the first semester of second year. Following that, a small review of what designs caught my eye through the year.

The year has been a mixture for myself. Some highs and some lows, though in all fairness the lows did outnumber the highs. The projects in the second semester of first year didn’t really grab my attention as much as I wished they would. This is apart from the second project undertaken in Design Studies regarding supermarkets, where I feel the group I was in (bar one member) put in some of the best work we had done at University up to that point, and it was the first time since possibly the December of 6th year at high school where I felt I had put in the sufficient hours and had gotten far. It was a good group to work in, but not as good as the group for the first project of Design Studies in that semester where we had to create characters out of ‘junk’, and then using these characters, create a story involving them.

The product design part of that semester was interesting to say the least. A combination of modelling a dyson, a kitchen object and creating a product which met an unmet need in the kitchen was required. At the time it didn’t really seem that relevant, and if I’m honest, part of me still does not see the point in what we did, but it, at times, was good fun none the less.

The mechanics module was, well, rubbish. A lot of time was spent helping others, which, I should point out, do not really mind doing as long as people at least say thank you. Then there are those (and only one or two) who I like to help without expecting thanks from because I like them too much to mind. However, once the exam was over in the middle of May, that was the hardest part of the Mechanics done and dusted for the full university course.

First year left me with mixed feelings about the course. On one hand it was not quite what I had thought it was going to be, and thoughts were coming into my head about whether or not I had made the right choice about what I wanted to to, or if I had chosen the wrong place to go since I could have gone to either Edinburgh or Glasgow instead of Dundee. However on the other hand, I did have quite a lot of fun in my first year, ranging from meeting huge amounts of new people, some who have left a huge impression on me, to doing a range of things which I would not have done anywhere else, from sticking my face in paint, in the name of leaving my mark, to making a Dyson out of blue foam.

Before I knew what was what, September sprung up again and it was time to head back up to Dundee for the start of the second year, and as it turned out two of the modules were once again verging on awful, but one was pretty decent. The two which were not that enjoyable though were not two which were expected.

The two modules which were the ‘unenjoyable’ ones were the Design Studies and the Industrial Design modules. Design Studies because we started the project very late, the workload in the group was very uneven (read that as 2 or 3 people in the group doing the work and pulling the weight of the other 3 or 4), and in all honesty it was not the most interesting project, despite the people involved, those with Aphasia, who were some of the nicest people anyone could meet.

The Industrial Design module did not start very well, and neither did it finish very well, however the middle was quite enjoyable. This was probably in part due to the fact the lecturer ripped down everything that was put forward and did not really give any useful criticism. They changed their mind from week to week, and strongly seemed to favour some people more than they did others. And I know that this sentiment is shared with at least one other person in the class.

I have posted a full review of those two modules previously where I covered everything, or almost everything, as fully as I could, or felt I could since this is publicly available. You can view them here for Industrial Design and here for Design Studies.

The surprise module was the mechanics one, or giving it its proper name, Software Applications. This one was surprisingly enjoyable. I think this was because it was the only time when I felt as thought I was learning new skills which would be useful in later life. It started off with AutoCAD and then onto Solidworks. Whilst neither were taught that well, self experimentation gave me most of the answers I needed (along with Google I should add). This was then passed onto the majority of the class, who seemed to ask me more than they did the bearded lecturer. Again the same opinion as per first year mechanics, I did not mind helping people, and definitely helping more people more than others. It was a good thing most of my work was completed by putting in longer hours than others at the start of each part of the project as the later parts were consumed spending time crouched down, on my knees, next to the computers.

The other part of this module which proved to be quite enjoyable was the Microcontrollers part, though I am probably on my own with this one. It did finish quite quickly, I felt as though I learned quite a lot, though maybe it is not quite as useful as the AutoCAD and Solidworks. The labs were good as well, working with people who I enjoy working with, and putting into practice what we had learned. We had to do a project as well, creating something which used a microcontroller and all the previous knowledge we had gathered. Our group, after initially wanting to go for a car traction control system, changed it to an outdoor keyboard. The basic prototype is shown in the picture below.

Overall 2009, in terms of the University course, was not as good as what I was hoping it would be. There just seemed to be too much of ego’s getting in the way in some areas, not knowing what was going on, having to carry people through projects and not seeing the relevance of what was being done. It was sort of counterbalanced by the fact I got to work with some really good people, begin to make more of a mark for myself up in Dundee, feeling more comfortable with what I was doing, and since the amount of alcohol consumed in writing this post has increased over the time it has been written (though not that much to say what I really am thinking and start to not make sense), gotten closer to people who I really enjoy being with.

I am hoping that 2010 will be a much better year overall in terms of university work. Hoping that it will be more useful, more enjoyable. One of the projects I am looking forward to though, is one where we are going to be making an MP3 player, which should be interesting. There are many areas in which I feel as though I could improve and I hope to do so quickly and effectively..

I am aware that I have gone on for quite a bit in this post, so I shall try to keep this next bit to a minimum, despite it being a part in which I could write so much more than my 2009 University musings. I shall also try and keep it away from my usual haunts of Apple and Bang & Olufsen (or as it has been said to me instead of B&O, Häagen Dazs), but in some instances I cannot help it.

One of the first pieces of design which was revealed in 2009 was the Apple Magic Mouse. I wrote a piece about its predecessor, the Mighty Mouse a while ago, citing reasons why people thought the scroll ball was a bad piece of design and possible areas of improvement. It seems that Jonathan Ive or Steve Jobs read what I wrote and implemented it in the Magic Mouse. It is probably one of the best pieces of Apple design, up there with the iMac G4. It’s beautifully simple and elegant, almost Scandinavian in its design, and I love it. I was very close to ordering one when it was launched, and sometime over the break, I am planning on heading to the Apple store in either Glasgow or Aberdeen to try one out and then possibly buy one. (Post about Mighty Mouse here).

The next piece of design which caught my eye in 2009 was the Bang & Olufsen Beotime. A gorgeous alarm clock inspired by a flute. I have no other words to describe it other than I want one. But then again, I am a bit of a sucker for B&O (and Apple I should add). It just seems that at the moment, both companies are producing products which are leading in each of their respective fields. We all have, in our minds, what we think an alarm clock should look like, the Danes then took this archetype, turned it upside down and rewrote it, or drew it to create the Beotime.

Despite only being a concept. the Art.Lebedev Transparentius caught my eye for being something epically unique. It takes an aspect of road safety and turns it into something which has not been seen before. It is absolutely astounding. When following a lorry and looking for opportunities to pass, the driver is often unaware of oncoming obstacles until they pull out, and it is often too late then. A camera mounted on the front of the lorry, projects the front view onto the rear of the trailer so the drivers behind are able to see ‘through’ the lorry. Whilst this could be quite distracting, it is a start to reducing the number of deaths on the roads. Additionally, being from Art.Lebedev studios, a Russian design company who are responsible for some of the most random, yet brilliant pieces of modern product design available, you know the final product will be just as radical and fun as the concept.

The final product which has captured my imagination is another one which I have written about. The Eigenharp. Not really being musically minded (despite playing the violin for a few years when I was younger), the Eigenharp is an electronic instrument with a difference. It looks beautiful and sounds pretty spectacular, especially the Moby Extreme Ways version. Read more on what I said about it in the original post here.

I know those four may not have been the most radical designs of the past 12 months. But those are the three which have made an impression on me, or the ones in which I can remember. I may end up adding a couple of more in the coming days, as this year draws to an end. What sort of things am I expecting to appear next year? I don’t know, that is the beauty of product design, and only a question which can be answered when you work in the industry and not just studying it.

So there we go. Nearing the end of not one of my favourite years. A post verging on 2000 words, and the general tone of my posts turning to grumbles instead of musings. I am planning on making a few changes on here for next year, some more subtle than others, a post sometime in January will hopefully and probably outline them. Thank you for reading my posts this year, and I hope everyone got something from at least one of them.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Flaw or Opinion?

I have tried to refrain from talking about them for this long, but for some reason, my urge to talk about something Apple related has risen to the top of the agenda. Being a consumer of their products, and also in the position of used both them and Microsoft operated pieces of technology, I am one of the people who can compare them with knowledge of both sides. However, this post is not going to be a Mac versus PC argument, there are millions of them on the interweb somewhere, and nomatter what anyone says, people will fight.

What I am going to discuss however is a piece of Apple hardware which has split opinion throughout the masses, one which people will refuse to use, yet others love it, it is the humble Mighty Mouse, but one part of it in particular, more on that later. The Mighty Mouse (possibly named after the cartoon character of the same name, I don’t know), was introduced to replace the Apple Pro Mouse, and was the first mouse produced by Apple with more than one button, a trademark of which lasted since the Lisa II in 1983. However despite it having more buttons, the exterior did not reflect this as it uses touch sensitive areas on the top and on the side, which allowed the design to be beautifully understated, like a bar of soap, or a lozenge. People, in general, love the look of it despite many arguing that it is not ergonomic enough to use for prolonged periods of time. I personally have never had any problems with it in this area, the buttons are all in the right place and the shape isn’t too much of a problem.

The one area which has drawn controversy amongst the masses is in regard to the scroll ball. That’s right, ball, not wheel, 360° movement instead of the linear direction provided by the wheel. The ball allows the user, to scroll left and right as well as up and down on the screen, application dependent, to save having to move the mouse to the bottom of the active window and pressing one of the directional arrows. So far, so good. This is where the problem comes in though. On a normal scroll wheel mouse, the wheel has ‘spokes’ and when it is turned, the spokes break an infrared beam (or something similar) inside the casing, this is transferred to an electrical signal, sent to the computer and shown on screen as movement. The way in which the mouse picks up the movement is not a physical connection. On the Mighty Mouse however, the ball is essentially in a cradle, and 4 rollers are pressed against it, these pick up the x and y directional movements, converts them to an electrical signal and so on.

It is this electrical connection which is causing all the bother, after a period of time, a layer of grime builds up on the rollers and eventually doesn’t come into full contact with the ball, meaning that the movement is no longer picked up in one or all of the directions rendering the function basically useless. Most people now would throw the peripheral away and buy a new one, but there are some methods of cleaning it such as turning it upside down and rolling the ball on a piece of paper, or for the more adventurous/technologically minded, carefully take it apart and clean the rollers by hand. Both are not ideal but they do the job fine, and I don’t mind doing either one bit so I would just say peoples thoughts on the scroll ball were opinion not a through and through design flaw.

Taking the stance that is in the majority, that it is a flaw, what could the design team at Apple do to rectify the problem? Increase the size of the scroll ball and rollers, making them more rugged? Probably not, because for one the problem would most likely return, only later than it does now. Utilise a normal scroll wheel? Of course not, that isn’t the way Apple thinks, they are not where they are by taking what is already there, they innovate, try and improve on things. Finally they could have gotten rid of the ball altogether and not used anything, the way their mice used to be. That wouldn’t solve anything, apart from giving the PC users more ammunition to use against the Mac followers.

What would I do as a designer in training? I would do one of two things. The first one being something similar to a trackpad on a laptop, but with the portability of a mouse, a stand alone trackpad, which had the movement laser underneath, and on the top, the trackpad itself could be used with the renowned gestures that feature on new Apple laptops and on the iPhone and iPod Touch. The second possibility would be to remove the scroll ball altogether from the mouse, but not move the feature completely from the device, instead the touch sensitive areas would also be used to track finger movement across the top of it in all directions. The only problem with that one being that many users may accidentally scroll when they are resting their fingers on it.

That’s my solution, we will just have to wait and see to what Apple come up with, if and when they come to update their mouse.

Mighty Mouse Ideas?

Tagged , , , , ,

A Vinyl Convert

Those of you who follow me on Twitter will know that for the past week or so, I have been transferring old LP’s and singles to the computer, so they can be burned to CD for my Mum and Dad. It has been a long and quite labourious task, especially in the area concerning equalizing the sound to the proper format, removing the static and splitting up the individual songs.

For audiophiles the world over, the vinyl record has almost always been regarded as the holy grail of music. This in part, is due to the way it revolutionised music listening for millions of people, but also because of the high quality sound reproduction it produced. Nowadays, the digital revolution has meant that music is either on CD’s or on a computer somewhere. Whilst this does save a huge amount of space in terms of storage, it does mean that many people are missing out on the experience of listening to music. I’m not saying it is a life changing experience, no, but there is something just so special about it, which the modern equivalents don’t seem to have or portray.

I have thought about what it is that makes it stand out, and have come up with what I think to be the answer. The fact that it is analogue. You can see the record turning, you have to move the arm and put the stylus where you want it to start playing. You are part of the physical process of the workings, and in a far greater way than say on a computer where you press a button and it goes itself. Fine fair enough, the digital revolution has made everything simpler for the user and it has made everything much more portable. But the user has been detached from the workings from it, and that is what makes the difference.

In my opinion, being able to see the mechanical workings of an object makes it much more satisfying to use because I can see how it works, know how it works, and at least attempt to fix it if it ever breaks. I’m not saying that technology is bad, it just isn’t as good in that respect due in part to the fact that if it stops working, an average person does not have the ability to repair it or even attempt to repair it unlike its analogue counterpart.

Design trends go in cycles, we are in one of great technical innovation at the moment, so hopefully the next cycle will be one which brings back the user interaction to the user as per the record player. It will just be a question of whether or not people will follow this trend as much as they have done already. As for me? I’m hooked with this ‘old’, analogue technology, and my iPod will have to wait its turn.

Analogue versus Digital

Tagged , , , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.